A Cave to live in.

If I found myself inexplicably thrust back in time to before human beings evolved, or I find myself in a parallel Universe where no other human beings are, I'd find myself a cave like this to live. Be relatively safe from predators, especially if I light a fire at the entrance.

Or, if everyone in the world disappeared apart from myself.

Beans on Toast

An American trying baked beans on toast for the first time ever. He likes it and he's surprised himself that he does. I eat beans on toast frequently. Quite nice, better than eating the beans and toast separately. They go well together.

This is hilarious, an American guy trying baked beans on toast for the first time pic.twitter.com/EXwTF28Euf

— Giles Paley-Phillips (@eliistender10) October 12, 2019

Heavy Cat

Must be a heavy cat.

Irrelevant Responses

When people ask a question on facebook or twitter or wherever, there's often just a endless series of responses with people making puerile jokes, posting irrelevant gifs etc. I've scrolled through 100's of responses sometimes without seeing a single sensible response. Frequently my response is the only one that is sensible, but of course it's lost amongst the hundreds of asinine responses, so very few people will see it. Are these responses not all just a complete waste of time and space?

A Mathematical Proof

I just love this! So simple, yet most of us wouldn't think of doing it like this.

When I was 15 we got this very question in a mathematics exam. It was, I think, the very last question and I imagine that we weren't expected to be able to do it. But I actually got it correct. However, I didn't do it like Gauss did (I'm not as gifted as Gauss). I added 0 to 9, which is 45. To add all the units it'll therefore be 10 times that = 450. I carried out the same precedure to all the 10's columns, so you get 450 * 10 = 4500. Add together 4500 + 450 = 4950. I even remembered to add the 100 at the end! 4950 + 100 = 5,500. Everyone else I talked to either guessed the answer, or forlornly tried adding up each number in turn!

How do earth do Amazon rank their customer reviews?

I notice that by default Amazon sort customer reviews by "top-rated". Even when changing to "order by date", it reverts back again when you click on "see all x reviews". If there's a fair few reviews this is important since any potential purchaser will likely only read the "top rated reviews". But I'm thoroughly mystified as to how they are determining their ratings. Let's take an example of a review that I submitted for a pack of six BIONA Organic Vegetable Juice cartons. I'll paste my review in here for convenience. 

I can't imagine people would drink this because they actually like the taste. Presumably they'll buy it for the health benefits? It's easy enough to drink. Not quite as drinkable as V8 veg juice, but the V8 is 87% tomato juice! This seems less than 87% tomato juice and hence there will be a greater percentage of other vegetables. It still tastes predominantly of tomato juice though (it doesn't tell you the respective percentages, why on earth are they not legally obliged to give this information?).

Here's what it contains -- Tomato Juice, Carrot Juice, Beetroot Juice, Cucumber Juice, Celery Juice, Sauerkraut Juice, Onion Juice, Sea Salt, Lemon Juice, Spice Extracts, Dill Juice.

All "certified organic juices".

Onion juice?? . . . .but anyway. The sodium content is a concern at 0.16g per 100ml. This is only 2/3rds of the sodium content of V8 Veg juice. However it is still a HUGE amount of sodium -- I believe that anything over 0.6g per 100g/100ml is defined as a high salt/sodium food in the UK (to get the amount of salt you multiply the sodium figure by 2.5). And it is recommended that you consume no more than 2.4g of sodium a day. One of these 500ml cartons will contain 0.8g of sodium, so if you drink a carton a day you'll be using up a third of your recommended maximum sodium/salt intake! 

I've been drinking a quarter litre a day of this juice for the past 2 weeks. Not sure if it's having any benefits, but I'll continue buying it and drinking it. 

In conclusion it seems it might be a better choice than the V8 alternative, although it is quite expensive. I have to order it from Amazon as it doesn't seem to be sold in any supermarkets where I live.

There are at this moment 25 reviews altogether.  Mine is rated by Amazon as the 23rd top-rated review -- or in other words Amazon rate my review as being the third worst out of the 25 reviews.

My review received 18 helpful votes from the public.  No other review gets more than 2 helpful votes and most reviews don't get any helpful votes at all.  Moreover, my review contains vastly more relevant information than any other review.  One of the reviews, the 7th top-rated, merely says, "first time, lets see if any good". This, of course, isn't a review at all, yet Amazon rate it as one of the better reviews. So I'm mystified as to how Amazon are rating customer reviews. They're not going by their customers opinions. They're not going by how useful the review is to a potential purchaser. So how on earth are they determining the ratings? Any answers below are very much welcomed!

Excel is infuriating!

Excel is Microsoft's spreadsheet program. Of course, being Microsoft, they just love to make their software frustrating to use. Why on earth does the "replace" function refuse to work sometimes? I'm trying to replace every instance of an "x" with "*A1^", but because doing so results in what they label as a "broken formula", it refuses to replace any of these x's! I am, of course, aware that it results in a "broken formula", but at least it gets me half way to the correct formula and would save me a great deal of work if the damn software would just obey my instructions. Why the heck won't it allow me to change it then simply give me the message that it's a broken formula?   

No more meat

Read the following article:

By 2040, 60% of ‘meat’ won’t come from dead animals.

In as little as 200 years time it is very possible no one will be eating real meat anymore. They'll look back in horror and wonder how anyone could consume dead animals. And many people in 2219 AD will despise anyone from our era who ate meat. Their statues will be pulled down, their books will be removed from libraries etc. Or at least conceivably this will happen!

If everyone died at once

Just thinking if there were a worldwide calamity, and humanity -- almost 8 billion of us -- all died at once. And let's also suppose there's an afterlife. Suppose that would be better than an individual dying alone. I mean, almost 8 billion of us floating up to some afterlife realm or realms. 8 billion bewildered souls in telepathic communication with each other asking where are we, what is this, where do we go? Be less scary than if one just died by oneself.

I am going to die sooner or later

I am going to die sooner or later. I don't know what will happen. Whether I'll just descend into eternal nothingness -- and wouldn't that be so boring, and bizarre? It would mean our lives are absurd and all things are absurd. That our lives and all things are a joke. Or I'll ascend into some new reality. That's also bizarre. So many questions like what the heck will I experience, how will my mind states change and so on. But, regardless, death will happen to me -- it will happen to all of us. Then my questions may be answered. Either that or an eternal sleep.