I keep getting messages on websites like the New York Times imploring me to support their outstanding journalism by allowing ads. How making me suffer by having ads pop up all the time helps support their journalism is quite beyond me. If they think I'm gonna take notice of advertisements, then they have another think coming. But if I don't take any notice of ads, then absolutely nothing is gained by me viewing them. All that happens is they just piss me off.
Apart from this all advertisements are immoral and should all be banned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Just reading the following article: 20 years ago, we were all set for a Y2K disaster that wasn’t Article says: Patti Duncan stockpiled ...
-
Many philosophers and scientists have some truly bizarre beliefs. The denial of consciousness (as we understand this term) is the most bizar...
-
I read this article. * The parents of a boy claims their boy appears to remember being Princess Diana in a former life. It's also cov... -
Ugh . . I had an important email that someone had sent me, so I foolishly imagined that selecting the archive option would ensure I don'...
-
According to this article Greenland is the country with the world's highest suicide rate. From 1900-1930 Greenland had a suicide rate ...
-
All aspects of consciousness -- whether pains, perceptual experiences, thoughts and so on -- can be changed, attenuated, modulated, even ...
-
So Liz Truss has announced her resignation as PM. The shortest serving PM ever -- just 44 days as PM. And something I predicted before sh... -
There's 2 possibilities: a) This is the only life there is. When we die we simply cease to exist. Our lives and the Universe are, in a...
-
I was just thinking. Suppose we could go into the future exactly 1 million years from now. What would we see? I would speculate that our t...
-
Someone on twitter/X asked the following question: A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the photo below, and asks "Will a c...
No comments:
Post a Comment