I keep getting messages on websites like the New York Times imploring me to support their outstanding journalism by allowing ads. How making me suffer by having ads pop up all the time helps support their journalism is quite beyond me. If they think I'm gonna take notice of advertisements, then they have another think coming. But if I don't take any notice of ads, then absolutely nothing is gained by me viewing them. All that happens is they just piss me off.
Apart from this all advertisements are immoral and should all be banned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Someone on twitter/X asked the following question: A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the photo below, and asks "Will a c... -
I recently read the following article: What the Buddha Didn't Teach About Reincarnation It says: "This is not to say that “we” ...
-
Woody Allen has said : I firmly believe ... that life is meaningless. I’m not alone in thinking this — there have been many great minds far...
-
It keeps being claimed (eg David Papineau, Sean Carroll et al ) that if consciousness caused anything in the brain over and above physical c...
-
According to this article Greenland is the country with the world's highest suicide rate. From 1900-1930 Greenland had a suicide rate ...
-
I bought the Lenovo D32-45 PC Monitor 10 days ago (it's not available on Amazon). It cost £169.00 which I believe is about the cheapest...
-
Someone said in a comment under a Guardian article: My solution to this problem is somewhat simplistic. I don't do social media. As in...
-
There's 2 possibilities: a) This is the only life there is. When we die we simply cease to exist. Our lives and the Universe are, in a...
-
An interesting Guardian article : It is worth reminding ourselves that the vast majority of our ancestors saw the world in a very different...
-
Yesterday I had a conversation with Claude (an LLM similar to ChatGPT) about hemispherectomies (permanently removing half of one's brain...
No comments:
Post a Comment