I keep getting messages on websites like the New York Times imploring me to support their outstanding journalism by allowing ads. How making me suffer by having ads pop up all the time helps support their journalism is quite beyond me. If they think I'm gonna take notice of advertisements, then they have another think coming. But if I don't take any notice of ads, then absolutely nothing is gained by me viewing them. All that happens is they just piss me off.
Apart from this all advertisements are immoral and should all be banned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
An interesting article about thought experiments here . People do tend to ignore thought experiments. I get the strong impression that they ...
-
Someone on twitter/X asked the following question: A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the photo below, and asks "Will a c... -
From here : 1. "If it’s a phenomena (and not just an event), it will or can be repeated". Depends what the author means by ...
-
I recently read the following article: What the Buddha Didn't Teach About Reincarnation It says: "This is not to say that “we” ...
-
Someone said in a comment under a Guardian article: My solution to this problem is somewhat simplistic. I don't do social media. As in...
-
The Wikipedia page on Lucy Letby First of all, let me say at the outset that I'm really loath to comment on whether I think she's gu...
-
There's 2 possibilities: a) This is the only life there is. When we die we simply cease to exist. Our lives and the Universe are, in a...
-
Woody Allen has said : I firmly believe ... that life is meaningless. I’m not alone in thinking this — there have been many great minds far...
-
According to this article Greenland is the country with the world's highest suicide rate. From 1900-1930 Greenland had a suicide rate ...
-
Below on the left is a photo of me taken back in 1985. I uploaded that photo to ChatGPT and said to it "Generate an image of what this ...
No comments:
Post a Comment