It's quite likely to be a mistake to suppose science is discovering the true nature of reality. Scientific theories most probably do not depict how things really are. Contrary to what scientists think eg Hawkings, Dawkins, Krauss et al, it's not truth that science is striving for, but rather improved engineering.
However it's important that scientists do not understand this and think they are revealing the true nature of reality. That gives them the psychological drive to invent new scientific theories. It is a noble lie.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Just reading the following article: 20 years ago, we were all set for a Y2K disaster that wasn’t Article says: Patti Duncan stockpiled ...
-
Many philosophers and scientists have some truly bizarre beliefs. The denial of consciousness (as we understand this term) is the most bizar...
-
I read this article. * The parents of a boy claims their boy appears to remember being Princess Diana in a former life. It's also cov... -
Ugh . . I had an important email that someone had sent me, so I foolishly imagined that selecting the archive option would ensure I don'...
-
According to this article Greenland is the country with the world's highest suicide rate. From 1900-1930 Greenland had a suicide rate ...
-
All aspects of consciousness -- whether pains, perceptual experiences, thoughts and so on -- can be changed, attenuated, modulated, even ...
-
So Liz Truss has announced her resignation as PM. The shortest serving PM ever -- just 44 days as PM. And something I predicted before sh... -
There's 2 possibilities: a) This is the only life there is. When we die we simply cease to exist. Our lives and the Universe are, in a...
-
I was just thinking. Suppose we could go into the future exactly 1 million years from now. What would we see? I would speculate that our t...
-
Someone on twitter/X asked the following question: A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the photo below, and asks "Will a c...
No comments:
Post a Comment