Sunday, 29 September 2019
Irrelevant Responses
When people ask a question on facebook or twitter or wherever, there's often just a endless series of responses with people making puerile jokes, posting irrelevant gifs etc. I've scrolled through 100's of responses sometimes without seeing a single sensible response. Frequently my response is the only one that is sensible, but of course it's lost amongst the hundreds of asinine responses, so very few people will see it.
Are these responses not all just a complete waste of time and space?
Thursday, 19 September 2019
A Mathematical Proof
I just love this! So simple, yet most of us wouldn't think of doing it like this.
When I was 15 we got this very question in a mathematics exam. It was, I think, the very last question and I imagine that we weren't expected to be able to do it. But I actually got it correct. However, I didn't do it like Gauss did (I'm not as gifted as Gauss). I added 0 to 9, which is 45. To add all the units it'll therefore be 10 times that = 450. I carried out the same precedure to all the 10's columns, so you get 450 * 10 = 4500. Add together 4500 + 450 = 4950. I even remembered to add the 100 at the end! 4950 + 100 = 5,500. Everyone else I talked to either guessed the answer, or forlornly tried adding up each number in turn!
Thursday, 12 September 2019
How do earth do Amazon rank their customer reviews?
I notice that by default Amazon sort customer reviews by "top-rated". Even when changing to "order by date", it reverts back again when you click on "see all x reviews". If there's a fair few reviews this is important since any potential purchaser will likely only read the "top rated reviews".
But I'm thoroughly mystified as to how they are determining their ratings. Let's take an example of a review that I submitted for a pack of six BIONA Organic Vegetable Juice cartons. I'll paste my review in here for convenience.
My review received 18 helpful votes from the public. No other review gets more than 2 helpful votes and most reviews don't get any helpful votes at all. Moreover, my review contains vastly more relevant information than any other review. One of the reviews, the 7th top-rated, merely says, "first time, lets see if any good". This, of course, isn't a review at all, yet Amazon rate it as one of the better reviews. So I'm mystified as to how Amazon are rating customer reviews. They're not going by their customers opinions. They're not going by how useful the review is to a potential purchaser. So how on earth are they determining the ratings? Any answers below are very much welcomed!
I can't imagine people would drink this because they actually like the taste. Presumably they'll buy it for the health benefits? It's easy enough to drink. Not quite as drinkable as V8 veg juice, but the V8 is 87% tomato juice! This seems less than 87% tomato juice and hence there will be a greater percentage of other vegetables. It still tastes predominantly of tomato juice though (it doesn't tell you the respective percentages, why on earth are they not legally obliged to give this information?).
Here's what it contains -- Tomato Juice, Carrot Juice, Beetroot Juice, Cucumber Juice, Celery Juice, Sauerkraut Juice, Onion Juice, Sea Salt, Lemon Juice, Spice Extracts, Dill Juice.
All "certified organic juices".
Onion juice?? . . . .but anyway. The sodium content is a concern at 0.16g per 100ml. This is only 2/3rds of the sodium content of V8 Veg juice. However it is still a HUGE amount of sodium -- I believe that anything over 0.6g per 100g/100ml is defined as a high salt/sodium food in the UK (to get the amount of salt you multiply the sodium figure by 2.5). And it is recommended that you consume no more than 2.4g of sodium a day. One of these 500ml cartons will contain 0.8g of sodium, so if you drink a carton a day you'll be using up a third of your recommended maximum sodium/salt intake!
I've been drinking a quarter litre a day of this juice for the past 2 weeks. Not sure if it's having any benefits, but I'll continue buying it and drinking it.
In conclusion it seems it might be a better choice than the V8 alternative, although it is quite expensive. I have to order it from Amazon as it doesn't seem to be sold in any supermarkets where I live.There are at this moment 25 reviews altogether. Mine is rated by Amazon as the 23rd top-rated review -- or in other words Amazon rate my review as being the third worst out of the 25 reviews.
My review received 18 helpful votes from the public. No other review gets more than 2 helpful votes and most reviews don't get any helpful votes at all. Moreover, my review contains vastly more relevant information than any other review. One of the reviews, the 7th top-rated, merely says, "first time, lets see if any good". This, of course, isn't a review at all, yet Amazon rate it as one of the better reviews. So I'm mystified as to how Amazon are rating customer reviews. They're not going by their customers opinions. They're not going by how useful the review is to a potential purchaser. So how on earth are they determining the ratings? Any answers below are very much welcomed!
Monday, 9 September 2019
Excel is infuriating!
Excel is Microsoft's spreadsheet program. Of course, being Microsoft, they just love to make their software frustrating to use.
Why on earth does the "replace" function refuse to work sometimes? I'm trying to replace every instance of an "x" with "*A1^", but because doing so results in what they label as a "broken formula", it refuses to replace any of these x's! I am, of course, aware that it results in a "broken formula", but at least it gets me half way to the correct formula and would save me a great deal of work if the damn software would just obey my instructions. Why the heck won't it allow me to change it then simply give me the message that it's a broken formula?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The myths and traditions of death
An interesting Guardian article : It is worth reminding ourselves that the vast majority of our ancestors saw the world in a very different...
-
Just reading the following article: 20 years ago, we were all set for a Y2K disaster that wasn’t Article says: Patti Duncan stockpiled ...
-
I read this article. * The parents of a boy claims their boy appears to remember being Princess Diana in a former life. It's also cov...
-
On the 13th January I discovered a lump on my neck. Eventually had an ultrasound and a fine needle aspiration. The lump was 4.2cms long and ...
-
I recently read the following article: What the Buddha Didn't Teach About Reincarnation It says: "This is not to say that “we” ...
-
Many philosophers and scientists have some truly bizarre beliefs. The denial of consciousness (as we understand this term) is the most bizar...
-
There's 2 possibilities: a) This is the only life there is. When we die we simply cease to exist. Our lives and the Universe are, in a...
-
According to this article Greenland is the country with the world's highest suicide rate. From 1900-1930 Greenland had a suicide rate ...
-
Someone on twitter/X asked the following question: A mathematician emerges from a cave, hands you the photo below, and asks "Will a c...
-
This is a continuation of the post about my cyst. I think it's sufficiently important to warrant a separate post. After asking many que...
-
It keeps being claimed (eg David Papineau, Sean Carroll et al ) that if consciousness caused anything in the brain over and above physical c...